Part 2: That. Look.

Our first full day after we made it back to London was also my birthday—my fiftieth, in fact. The younger was therefore feeling especially magnanimous, and agreed to accompany me to the Kenwood Ladies’ Pond, though she demurred at venturing into the water herself.

“I’ll just put my feet in,” she declared, to which I responded, “I don’t think you can! It’s in or out!”

I hadn’t been to the pond for a few years, and always find it slightly forbidding. The woman at the little ticket office at the entrance had a quizzical look on her face and I sensed we would have to prove ourselves in some way somehow to be permitted to enter, perhaps answering a riddle or performing some kind of feat.

“Hello, I would like to swim please!” I said.

She nodded.

“And she, I gesture to the younger, “doesn’t want to swim … can she just sit and watch?”

“Well, not when it’s crowded,” the woman said.

There was a pause as I considered whether this was a yes or a no.

It was about 9:30 on a grey weekday morning. I couldn’t really see into the pond and its environs past the ticket office, but it didn’t seem especially busy.

The woman sighed and reluctantly added, “I mean, at the moment, it’s fine.”

I now sighed with relief but the woman was not finished with us.

She narrowed her eyes and scrutinized the younger.

“Are you sure you don’t want to go in?”

The younger didn’t reply and I hastily jumped in.

“I tried to persuade her but she said she was sure she didn’t want to—and she didn’t bring her suit,” I added.

Throughout this exchange the woman was only making eye contact with the younger.

“Luckily for you,” she confided, in the quietly victorious tone in which one might say, “checkmate,” “we have loads of extra swimming costumes.”

I was still looking at the woman and not at the younger but I could imagine the latter’s expression, which was confirmed by the woman, who now howled with laughter and threw her head back.

“Oh my God, she just gave me That. Look,” she said to me, between guffaws.

I knew instantly what look she meant.

She continued, “That, ‘Mum. NO.’ look—my sixteen-year-old has perfected it.”

By now she had her phone out and was scrolling through pictures.

She showed us.

“See that’s me and my Mum, and we’re laughing and look at her!” she screeched.

She pointed to the third figure in the picture and then looked at me, shaking her head.

“She’s just looking off to the side!” she exclaimed, still incredulous.

I obliged her by looking but I really didn’t need to because I’d seen this picture a thousand times before, many of them on my own iPhone screen in the previous week: the happy family snap punctured by a teen’s withering kill-me-now side-eye, a move they seem reflexively to perfect in the preteen years, and which I find admirable and irritating in equal parts: admirable for its dogged refusal to perform bonhomie on cue, to render oneself Instagrammable. Irritating for how mercilessly it exposes my own readiness to perform and demand the facial expressions the algorithms associate with domestic felicity.

As reflexive as the younger’s side-eye was my own rote participation in the ticket-office woman’s good-natured complaining about her daughter.

Tipping my head at the younger, I confided, “Well she’s only 13 and she’s clearly already got it down! She’s precocious!”

I didn’t need to look in the younger’s direction to know that she had shriveled and expired from mortification during this exchange.

Even as the words tumbled out of my mouth I knew I would pay for this and, indeed, as we walked away the younger stared stonily ahead, muttering unspeakable things under her breath and shaking her head.

Standard

De Mouilpied:

Part 1. Locke, Croc, and Paddle

On the last Saturday in June 2024 we began the odyssey back from Iona to London. The first leg of the journey, the ferry from Iona to Fionnphort on Mull, is also the shortest. This time, as we gingerly made our way off the ferry onto the jetty at Fionnphort, seawater splashed up periodically between the cracks of the metal ramp on which we made our descent. This to and fro of the waves adds a slight sense of ceremony to the act of disembarking. While the thick-soled or those especially eager to claim the best seats on the bus thrust ahead, gentler souls—you could say the more tentative, but I would say those with a keener sense of timing—pause, the water’s woosh their cue to descend as the waves retreat, like the “and” that cues you to come in on the first note of an eight-bar phrase in a dance class.

When the water splashes Mum’s feet she says to my brother, who is holding her hand, that it is only fitting since her middle name is De Mouilpied, named after a place in Guernsey in the Channel Islands, where her mother grew up. According to my mother’s eldest sister, in email correspondence from 2018, “Mother’s grandmother was Elise Leale née De Mouilpied this is Guernsey-French, this means “of marshy meadows” but our irreverent Dorey cousins said it meant ‘the wet feet’!!”

Except that it is De Mouilpied not Des Mouillespieds! The singular is striking: she, not of the wet feet but of the wet foot, as if she’d put one foot in and then thought better of it; or as if my grandmother had held her daughter aloft and then, in what might be called a reverse-Achilles, carefully lowered her into the water so as to dip her heel—and one heel only!—into the marshy Guernsey meadow.

The mood of the single wet foot is different from that of wet feet, a fact reflected in the tonal difference between dipping one’s toe in the water and getting one’s feet wet.1 The former is dainty, tentative, whereas the latter evokes a gameness and can-do attitude that elicits a preemptive fatigue in me. Paddling is more playful than getting one’s feet wet—and I prefer the Britishism’s associative link with dabbling and dappling, by contrast to the American “wading,” which sounds positively laborious.2 You wade through something, to get somewhere, whereas paddling is an activity in itself.

Whether singular or plural, the drenching of one’s nethermost regions is commonplace on Iona. You step jauntily onto an innocent-looking patch of grass only to find your foot sinking rapidly into bog. With any luck you recognize your misstep in time to spare your second foot from the same fate, but now you must trudge on unevenly, with one squelchy foot, which gradually becomes unpleasantly warm, swaddled in sodden sock.

Having water seep into your shoes—or, in an idiom preserved in the OED that I think should be revived—being “wetshod,” is not generally an experience one enters into on purpose. Although the only part I remember from Locke’s treatise on education is the recommendation that, when raising “a young gentleman,” one should “have his shoes made so, as to leak water.” Locke’s logic is that this innovation will enable the gentleman to reproduce the experience of the hardy poor, who go barefoot and, “by that means, come to be so reconciled by custom, to wet their feet, that they take no more cold or harm by it, than if they were wet in their hands.”

To the long list of innovations we attribute to Locke, then, we should also add, Crocs, c. 1690. 3

Notes

  1. See OED: Additional sense (2021)1. 1901–to dip (also put, stick, etc.) one’s toe in (the water) and variants: to try something new cautiously or gradually; to experiment tentatively.
    P.7.f. 1924–to get one’s feet wet: to begin to participate in an activity; to gain initial experience. ↩︎
  2. See OED: wade, verb, 3c, 3.c. figurative. (Now chiefly, to go through a tedious task, a long or uninteresting book.) ↩︎
  3. When I tried to tell the younger about Locke’s idea while writing this post, she made it known that she was already well acquainted with his proposal, because I told her about it last time she found herself wetshod, which was, in fact, on Iona, when the duct tape holding her Chuck Taylors together finally gave out. ↩︎

Standard

The cap that got away

I started this blog because I discovered through writing letters how much I enjoyed writing in the voice that emerged in that medium. Today I’m sharing a story that I’ve lifted, almost verbatim, from a letter I wrote in 2014. I’ve made a few cuts but otherwise left the story as told in the letter because it captures not only the events of the story (which had occurred, at the time I was describing them, nearly ten years earlier) but also a version of myself I now envy, because she was so blithely assured of the enduring presence of someone in the world who is now absent from it.

That person is Louisa Shea, who—shockingly, unthinkably—died last week. Since I heard the news, I’ve been flooded with memories of Louisa and, at some point, when I’ve had more time to reflect, I hope to share some of them. In the meantime, I share this story—in which Louisa has only a supporting role but one that reflects her lively and mirthful nature.

The story as written also attests to my enduring awe at how effortlessly brilliance, kindness, and beauty combined in Louisa. But I’m sharing it as written also because there’s a sting in the tail that I think is instructive, which is that it is guttingly apparent in the final line how utterly I took Louisa’s vibrant presence in the world for granted—and I wish very much now that I had not.

Here is the story.

June 16, 2014

I once had a beautiful custom-made baseball cap made of cream-colored canvas with a tan suede brim. Embroidered on the cream canvas in orange thread were the words “I am Sarah and I am, ‘ow you say, rustique.” It is one of the minor but enduring regrets of my life (minor because I recognize that, after all, it’s only a cap) that I no longer possess this cap. I’ve been through my possessions countless times hoping that it will turn up at the bottom of some box. 

This is the story of how I came to possess that cap. I have a friend called Louisa. She is another of my mysterious, beautiful friends. We were undergraduates at Cambridge together, where she was doing her second B.A., in English, having already done her first, in Italian, at Smith College. In addition to being mysterious and beautiful, she is also very brilliant, and, most aggravating of all, the sweetest, most generous, loveliest person. So, much to my chagrin, I was unable to hate her and instead we became friends.

Coincidentally, we both were accepted to Harvard to do our PhDs, hers in Comp. Lit., mine in English. Her brother and sister were already there, finishing up their PhDs (yes, that’s right; three siblings, all Harvard PhDs.) At Harvard, we saw each other constantly. Through Louisa I got to know all the cool kids in Comp. Lit. and Romance Languages (my friend Claire was studying Italian). Eventually, we got a house together with another girl, Gina, who was studying Italian.

Because Louisa herself was so international and glamorous (her parents lived in France; she was trilingual in English, French, and Italian, and she also spoke excellent German) she ran with an international and glamorous crowd. One of her great pals was this French dude called Michel. They had met at some course in Paris. He was doing his PhD in political Philosophy in Paris, but he always seemed to be visiting us. From the beginning, I found myself unable to take Michel seriously and, moreover, found him seriously aggravating. He embodied a particular archetype of male Frenchness that Louisa found hilarious and charming and which I did not.

Michel wore black leather pants. His shirt was always half undone, exposing his ample chest hair. He was always hanging out in our house singing along, with great passion, to Sarah McLachlan, which he played very loudly. He was always trying to get me to like Sarah McLachlan, and it wasn’t going to happen. 

We would encounter each other regularly in the front hallway of our house. He would be shirtless, wearing his ridiculous acid-washed cut off jeans. My arms would be folded across my chest with my face set to “skeptical.” He was a posturing, strutting peacock (his signature dance move involved dropping to his knees and writhing) but I could see that he was, in addition, a generous and incredibly warm friend to Louisa, so I always felt guilty that I couldn’t like him more. He accompanied Louisa and me when we went to file our dissertations. Of course, he was there mainly for her, but I remember still how he flipped through my list of Works Cited and told me he could tell I’d written something important (!) and that he bought us both champagne afterwards. 

So, you have an idea of Michel now. The reason I came to possess that cap, which Michel had made for me, was to commemorate a particular occasion. We were in the graduate dining hall. We were all—me, Michel, Louisa, and some others—sitting around and eating and talking. I think I may have been telling a story and eating and laughing at the same time.

I noticed Michel just kind of looking at me and smirking and shaking his head.

“What!?” I exclaimed, looking at him. “Why are you looking at me like that?” [And here, obviously, I’m reconstructing from memory] 

Michel [still grinning]: I just love the way you’re …. You’re not like other women … you just don’t care …. 

Me: [immediately on my guard]: what do you mean, I just don’t care?

Michel [grinning like a loon throughout]: Oh, you know, other women care about their appearance, about how they come across, but you’re, you’re just so natural, the way you sit, the way you talk, the way you eat, it’s like, it’s like [searching for the right word in English], like you’re a peasant.

Me: [my mouth hanging open, doubtless in peasant like fashion]: like, like, I’m a peasant???

Michel: [realizing from my expression that he’s said something terribly wrong, looks to Louisa, who is crying with laughter, her hand covering her face. Michel starts jabbering to her in French, hoping she’ll help him find the right words that will dig him out of this hole and create the impression that this is all an innocent case of a compliment being ruinously botched in translation. But she’s no help, she’s laughing too hard, so he’s on his own and this what he finally comes up with]: I mean, no, not like a peasant, but you are, you are, ‘ow you say, rustique.

Me: [stony faced]: Rustique? 

Michel: [warming to his theme]: right, rustique, natural, there’s no artifice, I mean I really like it, the way you are.

Me: [stony faced]: Uh-huh.

Everyone at the table at this point is crying with laughter. And they are laughing both because there is something true about what Michel is inelegantly observing about me and because he has expressed it in the most cringe-inducing fashion possible.

At this point, Michel and I are the only ones not laughing, me, because I am genuinely mortified. Am I really like a peasant? Is that what everyone really thinks and it’s only Michel, with his complete lack of inhibition, who would ever tell me? I refuse to crack a smile, in fact, I think I might cry. Michel, seeing this, now feels terrible.

Michel ended up apologizing and I accepted his apology and ended up admitting that there might be a grain of truth and no intended malice in his observation. This was not the last of our falling-outs. We had another when he came to stay in our house when Louisa was away. He was there, with just me, for what felt like weeks. And then there was the morning when I came downstairs to the smell of burning formica. He had made coffee in the stovetop espresso maker and then picked it up, burned himself, and hastily put it down on the counter, where it had burned several holes. He was terribly apologetic and promised to “fix it.” I was really mad because I knew it couldn’t be “fixed,” the counter surface would have to be replaced (this was a Professor’s house that we were renting). He was genuinely sorry, really sorry, but we ended up having our security deposit withheld and he didn’t contribute to the cost.

I can’t remember if it was after this, but I think it probably was, that he presented me with the cap. It was classic Michel. He had had it made at a local mall where they had some place where, I suppose, you could get a cap emblazoned with anything you wanted. Something about the combination of the high-quality nature of the cap’s materials combined with its ugliness and the ridiculousness of the quotation emblazoned upon it made it …. priceless. My emotions upon receiving it embodied my feelings about Michel. I laughed and laughed and I also wanted to throttle him and I was also both touched and genuinely bemused (you actually had this made? You decided that this was a concept that actually required execution? Do you think I am going to wear this?). It is one of the more memorable gifts that I have received in my lifetime.

I haven’t seen Michel for probably 12 years. I wish I could remember his last name. I’d Google him and see if he is a famous professor of political philosophy. Of course I could just email Louisa and ask her. But I probably won’t.

Standard

literally no pants

THE YOUNGER [5 minutes before she had to leave for school this morning]: Mom, I literally have no pants I can wear to school.

ME [tentatively, understanding this is some sort of test]: But you’re wearing pants?

THE YOUNGER: But I can’t wear these to school.

ME [reflexively, even while understanding the answer will not make sense to me]: Why not?

THE YOUNGER: Because I wore them to school yesterday.

ME [making recourse to “logic,” still acting as if my task in this exchange is to prove that she literally does have pants she can wear to school]: So that means you can wear them to school!

THE YOUNGER: [very slowly, as if talking to someone with limited comprehension]: No, Mom, I can’t wear them to school BECAUSE I wore them to school yesterday.

ME [still not recognizing this is more like a one-person flash mob than a conversation]: OK, so wear a different pair of pants.*

THE YOUNGER [now speaking more loudly and taking big gulps of air between words]: Mom. You’re not. Listening. I said, I literally have no pants I can wear to school.

ME: [why am I still talking? I don’t know why]: But you have lots of pants!

THE YOUNGER: No, I don’t.

ME [pointing to chair triumphantly, for some reason thinking ocular demonstration will win the day] There! There are two pairs of pants right. there! You can wear either of those.

THE YOUNGER: I can’t wear those.

ME: Why not?

THE YOUNGER: They are too big.

ME: They are too big?

At this point I feel my mind beginning to slip loose from my body. I bend over holding my head in my hands and hear a kind of groan, I think it comes from me. I know the bloody pants are too bloody big. You know how I know? Because I was with her when she bought them and she bought them that way on purpose. On purpose. So that they would look too big. Because that was the effect she was trying to achieve lo those many weeks ago.  

ME [why am I asking this question or any question?]: What will happen if you wear the same pants you wore yesterday?

THE YOUNGER: [stares stonily at me, not dignifying this question with a response. Which, in retrospect: fair.]

ME: OK, well ….

THE YOUNGER: So what do I do?

ME: What do you mean?

THE YOUNGER: [increasingly using the tone you would use to say, again, “there is a bomb in this building,” to someone not reacting with the appropriate urgency]: Mom. I. literally. Have. No. pants. I can. Wear. To school. So what do I do? What do I do?

ME: I mean, I don’t know what to say. What do you want me to say? You do [a slightly hysterical chirrup of a giggle escapes my lips despite myself] you do have to wear pants … I believe … to school. You can’t go, uh, without pants.

Do I see a flash of a smile also pass across her face, or is it just my imagination?

THE YOUNGER: So what do I do?

ME: [in the tone I would use to make a guess I’m pretty sure is wrong in answer to a riddle]: Umm …. you wear the pants you’re wearing even though you wore them yesterday?

THE YOUNGER: Mom. You’re not understanding, Mom.

ME: [now fully engulfed in helpless and unhelpful giggles]: I’m not understanding. Yes. I, I, I, I, I’m not understanding. That’s right. I, I , I, I  just don’t know. I don’t even know where. I don’t know what …

THE YOUNGER: …. And even if I wore these, I don’t have a top I could wear with them.

ME: [seizing, like a hostage negotiator, on this tiniest movement]: Oh, well, tops! Tops! There are plenty of tops! There’s this and this–or even this!

THE YOUNGER: But they don’t have hoods.

Our exchange continued for quite a while longer after this because I was very slow to realize what I was there for, which, I would say now, three hours later, was not to solve the problem of having literally no pants to wear to school but to bear witness to this problem as it arose and crested and then passed away. The only thing to do with flashmobs is to wait for them to be over.

I should have realized this earlier because just last night I had my own version of this experience. I suddenly became aware of my feelings pricking uncomfortably against my eyes and fingertips; it was one of those autonomic inner flashmobs in which my emotions seemed to slide out of joint with my intentions, my body to slide out of joint with my surroundings. In the moment I wouldn’t have described the problem as literally having no pants I could wear to school; but it would have been as good a description as any. In such moments you don’t need an interlocutor to answer the question “what do I do?” but rather a witness—external or internal—to hear your discomfort find expression in the question: What do I do? What do I do? It is a question that does not go away because it is answered, but because it recedes into the background, until next time.

At a certain point I left the room and, at a certain point after that, the younger emerged, wearing a hoodie and the same pants she’d been wearing all along, ready to go to school.

Note

* The reader should be aware that other types of lower-body garments are not an option in this scenario.

Standard

the frozen one

“Do we have any more toothpaste?” yells the younger.

 “Why? The tube is mostly full,” I say, walking into the bathroom.

“But that one’s soooooo disgusting,” she says, wrinkling her nose.

I pick up the shiny red tube of Colgate Optic White Advanced and inspect it as if doing so will disclose something to me.*

“Huh, so, you don’t like that one? I didn’t realize you still didn’t like adult toothpaste. Hold on, I think I have some of the kind you like in the closet.”

I root around in the chest of drawers in the hallway and hand her a lurid green and purple tube.

“Ewww … No!”

She reacts as if I’ve just handed her a tube of poo.

Berry bubble???!” she continues, reading the description on the tube. “That’s so gross. That’s some kind of baby toothpaste that probably expired, like 5 years ago!”

I’m mildly surprised to discover that we concur that berry bubblegum flavored toothpaste is a revolting concept.

I peer at the tube, which is adorned with trolls. I vaguely recall buying multiple tubes in bulk some time ago, and it must have been when one of those similarly luridly colored movies came out so, to be fair, it probably is pretty old. But also surely chemically imperishable, no?

“Wait, so you think the minty one is gross and also this one is gross. What have you even been using??”

To me, we have pretty much covered the toothpaste spectrum: there’s sickly-sweet pink goo for babies or laceratingly minty enamel-scouring white for the advanced. Pick your poison.

“I like the frozen one,” she says tentatively.

The frozen one.

I’m frowning, puzzled, as I open the bathroom trash can and fish out the old tube.

I start laughing.

“OK, I’m sorry, you won’t even try the Trolls toothpaste because it’s for babies, but you like the Frozen one???”

Elsa and Ana’s sparkling blue eyes peer out at me from the scrunched-up tube, which I now hold aloft.**

“I looooove Elsa, so I only use Frooooozen toothpaste!!” I trill in a sing-song voice.

The younger is now laughing hysterically.

“Noooooooo!” she gasps, between giggles.

 “I looooooove Elsa, even though I’m really more of an Ahhhhhhhhna, and I only use Froooooozen toothpaste!” I sing even more flamboyantly, and the younger is laughing so hard I think she might expire.

Notes

* Optic White is a strange name. The brand that came up with the name, Lexicon, says that “in our review of more than 300 products in several countries, the word optic did not surface. Our research showed that, for consumers, the combination of optic and white triggered strikingly positive associations.” Surely their research also revealed that Optic White is the name of the paint color made by Liberty Paints (“If It’s Optic White, it’s The Right White”) in Invisible Man?

** Note that it is their eyes that sparkle, not their teeth, which are barely visible. It strikes me that a better avatar for toothpaste would be a Big Bad Wolf (“Grandmother, what white teeth you have!”).

Standard

know enough

The younger and I stepped out to walk to school this morning.

“it’s a beautiful day!” I exclaimed as the sun pierced through the June gloom skies.

“I guess.”

Her tone felt like a rebuke.

“What???” I protested.

You, what????” she countered.

“It is a beautiful day!” I insisted.

She shook her head and sighed.

We crossed the street, catty-corner, and as we made our way down 21st street in silence I barely took in something on the sidewalk, indistinct, grey, a piece of gum, maybe, a dirty fragment of a squishy toy.

“I have to stand up and give out awards today, like at the Oscars,” I began.

“Ugh!” she exclaimed, a little too vehemently, I thought.

“What?”

“I just saw a dead baby bird.”

“What? Oh! Was that …?” I half-turned back as we walked. “I saw something, I didn’t realize.”

“It was so tiny.” She looked at me.

“Oh!” I exclaimed.

“It didn’t even have feathers.” She looked at me again, as if she was asking me a question.

“Oh that’s sad,” I said. “No baby bird. No bird life.”

(The evening before, looking at an agitated bird I had disturbed by picking a lemon from the tree in the backyard, I had wondered aloud, “What do you think it feels like to be a bird?” The younger had rolled her eyes and shaken her head.)

“What do you think happens when we die?” I asked.

What?” She wrinkled her face and shook her head. “No!!”

“What?! No, what?!”

“No!!!! You are always asking these …. questions! Like, from your podcasts or something.

“They are not from podcasts,” I insisted, indignantly.

She continued to shake her head while sighing and growling in irritation.

Now I sighed. “I’m sorry it’s just that, I, I like you, so I want to know you, I want to know what you think about things!”

“You do know me,” she fairly spat. “You know enough.”

Now I remembered my friend telling me yesterday that her friend had told her that her daughter’s school encouraged parents not to ask questions, nor to react emotively to any disclosures that might be made.

“Okay, fine,” I conceded, chastened.

We walked in silence then, except for when a quickly suppressed giggle escaped me when we heard a boy walking behind us exclaim to his friend, “Dude, the Across the Spider-Verse soundtrack just dropped!”

The younger glared at me and shook her head.

On the last block before we reached the school, a girl about the younger’s age was trying to stuff her sweatshirt into her backpack on the sidewalk and shot us a sheepish glance as we walked around her.

“Sorry,” she mumbled.

“It’s all right!” I said cheerfully.

Stop,” spat the younger at me under her breath.

I sighed and we crossed the last intersection before the corner where we would part ways. This is always a moment that demands immaculate timing in executing precise choreography.  

“OK, have a good day,” I said as we approached the sidewalk.

“OK,” she mumbled.

“I love you,” I said as I reached to pull her head towards me and leant in to kiss it just at the moment we stepped up onto the sidewalk corner and before our trajectories divided.

Today, though, she tilted her head away ever so slightly as I leaned in so that all I kissed was a gauzy curtain of hair, my lips never meeting scalp, the missed kiss leaving me slightly off-kilter like the sensation of trying to step up onto a step that isn’t here.* I half- gasped, half-laughed as our paths divided, she continuing straight, me veering right, and we both looked back, her eyes narrowed, a glare with a smirk not quite piercing through.

Notes

*“Another part of the ritual was to ascend with closed eyes. “Step, step, step,” came my mother’s voice as she led me up—and sure enough, the surface of the next tread would receive the blind child’s confident foot; all one had to do was lift it a little higher than usual, so as to avoid stubbing one’s toe against the riser. This slow, somewhat somnambulistic ascension in self-engendered darkness held obvious delights. The keenest of them was not knowing when the last step would come. At the top of the stairs, one’s foot would be automatically lifted to the deceptive call of “Step,” and then, with a momentary sense of exquisite panic, with a wild contraction of muscles, would sink into the phantasm of a step, padded, as it were, with the infinitely elastic stuff of its own nonexistence.” Vladimir Nabokov, Speak Memory (1966).

Standard

Iona notes 2022, June 18-July 1

6.18.22

Some kind of personality switch seems to have affected both children upon entering the house we are staying in.

“I feel like going for a walk,” announces the younger.

“Does anyone want to do this puzzle with me?” asks the elder.

After her walk, the younger finds me in the kitchen starting to make dinner.

“How can I help?” she asks.

***

Cousin T. gets in late, the epic journey from London to Iona made more epic by his sleeper train arriving late into Glasgow, causing him to miss his connecting train to Oban.

After dinner he announces, “There’s a slightly squashed Alphonso mango that I brought from London at the bottom of my rucksack, if anyone wants some.”

6.19.22

Walking to the shop we pass cousin N. pushing his baby in her stroller. We discuss what kind of fish he’s catching these days and order some langoustine and mackerel for the following week.

My cousin L. tells us about a concert we might be interested in going to.

“It’s a benefit concert for the Scottish Refugees,” she explains.

Seeing my puzzled face she adds, “I mean, the name’s unfortunate, they’re a Scottish organization that helps refugees, not refugees from Scotland.”

A woman outside the shop warmly greets Mum, who has no idea who she is. At first we assume it’s someone Mum knows but doesn’t recognize but it turns out that the woman has mistaken Mum for her sister. The woman works at the Argyll Hotel, where my aunt often stays when she visits. We were hoping her visit might overlap with ours this year, but “groups of Americans” had booked out the hotel, she reported. Our friend from the Argyll confirms, while maintaining an admirable poker face, that the hotel is currently hosting an American group calling themselves, “soul collage.” A few minutes of intense speculation as to the nature of said collaging follows.

That night I half-jokingly announce that there are three subjects I would like to propose as topics for dinner-time conversation during the trip. 1. UAPs AKA UFOs: what’s the deal? 2. Is the Google AI really sentient? 3. Do we have free will? We never actually get beyond the first topic, which we revisit throughout the trip, egged on by the younger, who mostly doesn’t weigh in but listens intently. “it’s fun listening to you all debate these kinds of things,” she confides sheepishly. I draw a line, though, when the conversation starts drifting into the paranormal. It’s strange: I believe in aliens, and they don’t scare me—in fact, the idea of aliens being real makes me feel warm and secure in the way that I find it reassuring to hear the hum of other people’s activity when drifting to sleep. By contrast, I don’t believe in ghosts; and they terrify me.

6.20.22

The kids and I settle into a routine of watching movies on the television in the sitting room at night. At home we have a Roku for streaming TV and movies on our projector, so there is no such thing as stumbling upon something that’s halfway through. The kids therefore find the roulette of flipping through channels novel, and I find watching half of a mediocre movie just because it’s on comfortingly evocative of my childhood. One night we settle on a Robin Hood film from 2010 starring Russell Crowe. When cousin T. hears we’re watching Robin Hood he is excited.

“I wonder if it’s the one we watched in Islamabad!” he exclaims.

Probably not, I say.

It turns out he’s talking about the 1950s British television show starring Richard Greene, of which cousin T. was a big fan, although it also created certain false expectations later dashed when he came to live in England.

“I went to Nottingham and saw their so-called forest,” he recounts, disdainfully. “I wanted to see if it was real. It was very disappointing.”

“But then,” he continued, brightening, “one time I was in Stirling and I visited the castle Glamis from Macbeth (“Glamis is nowhere near Stirling,” Mum interjects). And then, when I came to Iona, your Uncle D. showed me the tombs of the Scottish kings including Macbeth—it was real!”

Cousin T. hasn’t been to Iona since he joined us here one summer when I was a kid, and this trip has put him in a nostalgic mood. He has also now warmed to his theme, which is emerging as geographical-sites-in-the-U.K.-with-literary-connections. He admonishes for me for not yet having taken the kids to Stratford-upon-Avon, and urges me to remedy this blunder on our next trip.

“When you were a baby your parents came to visit me when I was at Warwick, and we went to see A Midsummer Night’s Dream at Stratford and you stayed awake and didn’t cry during the whole performance!”

This detail makes me doubt the story, because I cry at everything—though, come to think of it, I shed not a single tear at Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood.

6.21.22

One drizzly day the kids and I walk to Columba’s Bay. We pass a group of Americans and whisper furtively about whether they look like soul collagers. Columba’s Bay is an especially good spot to find beautiful pebbles. The abundance is dazzling and almost overwhelming. It’s like being … in Target. You know? I decide I want to find a pink perfectly egg-shaped and sized stone. Once I start sifting through pebbles, I find it difficult to stop. I feel that I could spend hours, days, years, sitting here looking for the perfect pebble. I never do find one that is quite perfect but the kids do—a massive greenish yellow perfectly smooth egg-shaped stone, hereafter known as The Dinosaur Egg.

I wake up very early for the first several days because I don’t realize there’s a blind on the skylight in my bedroom, and the sky starts to get light around 4am. When I mention this, the others insist I do in fact have a blind and I am obliged to concede when the younger points it out to me (it was just so subtly flush with the window frame as to have been imperceptible to me) and then kindly lowers it for me. The next morning I sleep late and stumble down into the kitchen. “Can I make you coffee?” the younger offers.

How can I preserve this magic, I wonder to myself.

6.22.22

I haven’t been paying much attention to the news but one night I sit down with Mum as she watches the Channel Four News on the day of the earthquake in Afghanistan. I recognize the reporter—a salt-and-pepper haired man, speaking gravely in that unmistakable British-reporter-on-location cadence—as a boy I used to babysit—the son of family friends—now grown up.

6.23.22

“I want to learn to cook,” the younger announces.

We make chocolate chip cookies, and she writes the recipe down in her notebook. The next day we make shortbread, and she writes that recipe down too.

6.24.22

Cousin T. wants to make his Famous Greek Lamb—which I remember being delicious, a kind of stove-top roasted leg of marinated lamb. There is no lamb available at the shop and I am wondering whether we will have to get in touch with our sheep-stealing Tindal roots. But then we hear a rumor of someone on the island who might be able to sell us some Hogget, which (I discover) refers to a sheep that is Not a Lamb, Not Yet Mutton. The Hogget is savory but tough; but perhaps it would say the same about me.

6.25.22

Cousin T. also cooks abundant Bengali food while on Iona. Chicken, daal, rice, and vegetables one day; the next day, my favorite: daal pooris with aloo bhaji and fried eggs.

We have reached peak Tindal Kareem.

6.26.22-7.1.22

After an agonizing delay—stormy weather having stalled the ferry, which sent the younger into a tailspin at the prospect of her reunion with her cousin being forestalled—the rest of the family finally arrive—and amidst all the squealing and hugging and biking and sea-plunging and long-jumping and jellyfish-rescuing and hottubbing and jigsaw-puzzling and cartwheeling and G&Ting and karaokeing and Wimbledoning and scavenger-hunting that ensued, there was not a moment in which to jot down a single other note.

Standard

Fatal Vexation

We must cherish joy where we find it in these dark times. For me, today, that has meant savoring the fact that David Hume, in his magisterial six-volume History of England (1754-61), records no fewer than seven people in English history as having died from vexation and / or disappointment. 

These are their (somewhat abrupt) stories.

  • “Aldred, archbishop of York, who had set the crown on William’s head, had died a little before of grief and vexation.”
  •  “The affliction for this disaster, and vexation from the distracted state of his affairs, encreased the sickness under which [King John] then laboured; and though he reached the castle of Newark, he was obliged to halt there, and his distemper soon after put an end to his life.”
  •  “Harris, an alderman of London, was indicted, and died of vexation before his trial came to an issue.”
  • “The high-spirited nobleman [Southampton] retired from the council, and soon after died from vexation and disappointment.”
  • “Drake himself, from the intemperance of the climate, the fatigues of his journey, and the vexation of his disappointment, was seized with a distemper, of which he soon after died.”
  • “[Walter Devereux, first Earl of] Essex died of a distemper, occasioned, as is supposed, by the vexation, which he had conceived, from his disappointments.”
  • “That gallant Englishman [Sir John Norris], finding that he had been deceived by treacherous promises, and that he had performed nothing worthy of his ancient reputation, was seized with a languishing distemper, and died of vexation and discontent.”
  • And, just to end on a high note, a non-fatal case of vexation:
    • “But though he [Robert Devereux, second Earl of Essex, son of Walter—so genetic predisposition to fatal vexation] affected to be so entirely cured of his aspiring ambition, the vexation of this disappointment, and of the triumph gained by his enemies, preyed upon his haughty spirit, and he fell into a distemper, which seemed to put his life in danger.” But then, Elizabeth I sent him “some broth” and “a message” and Essex was “restored in his health”!!! (True, he is executed the following year, at age 34, having “given reins to his ungovernable passions, and involved, not only himself, but many of his friends, in utter ruin.” But still.)

simonet

Detail from engraving by Jean-Baptiste Simonet, illustration from Johann Wolfgang Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther

Standard

The Well Wrought Bun

I’ve been fiddling around a lot with my hair recently—mostly pinning it up in various configurations. Partly, it’s because my hair has grown really long in quarantine. Also, until quite recently, I’ve been between knitting projects and braiding hair is soothing in a similar way to knitting yarn. Most of all, my threshold these days for what might be considered a diverting indoor activity is very low. I’ve been inspired, in the various hairstyles I’ve attempted, by a number of iconic updos that have featured in recent movie nights. My kids like Star Wars for the epic battles but I’m in it for the epic hair. I’m not crazy about the original side buns; but I really like Leia’s (much more flattering) braided bun in the ceremony at the end of the first movie. People always pan Return of the Jedi but, in hair terms, it will always and forever be my favorite because of its rich interplay of braided updos, and, also, Ewoks.

Now the kids and I are half way through the Hunger Games film series—which is set in a dystopian world that did not quite so brazenly mirror our own when I read the books back in the 2010s. If only we had the Mocking Jay. Katniss Everdeen: an excellent shot; also a very strong braid game. And braiding your own hair is hard—even when you’re not also in a life-or-death reality show. Braiding your own hair demands considerable upper-arm strength. That’s probably why Katniss is so good at them. Or maybe it’s the other way around; maybe she’s good with a bow and arrow because her arms are so strong from all the intensive braiding.

Both Katniss and Leia in Return of the Jedi wear a version of the style I’ve most often attempted lately: two braids—just regular pigtails—pinned across the top of my head. This hairstyle, the internet insists, is called “milkmaid braids,” which is gross, and makes the look sound less woman warrior more Tess of the D’Urbervilles, which is not what I am going for. That being said, it is a hairstyle that I associate with both falling and shame, so maybe the identification with Hardy’s tragic fallen heroine is apt. Until recently, I hadn’t worn “milkmaid braids” in decades. But it’s a hairstyle with which I have an intimate and somewhat traumatic history, because it was the regulation hairstyle during my two years at the Royal Ballet School in London, which was, as its name signals, no rustic barn but, rather, an extremely forbidding and rarefied institution.

The “Junior Associate” wing of the Royal Ballet School (for students between eight and eleven), which I joined in 1981, is also, I should say, a genuinely illustrious program in the history of ballet. The School was created in 1948 by Dame Ninette de Valois, a renowned ballet dancer who danced with Diaghilev’s Ballet Russes before going on to found the Royal Ballet and its affiliated school. I recall her (quite vaguely and possibly unreliably) as a romantically witchy long-haired old lady (kind of like Mags from The Hunger Games) who would occasionally sit in on our classes along with Jocelyn Mather, who was the head of the program, and whom I recall as having a more forbidding Margaret-Thatcher like aura. When they visited our class, it was a big deal. Also—and this may have been the most thrilling aspect of the program—our classes were actually held backstage in the Sadler’s Wells Theatre—I was, in fact, I just learned today, part of the first year of students who took classes there. My Mum would drop me off and I would dash in the stage door of the theatre, saying hello to the doorman on the way in. This aspect of the program—the feeling that I had been granted entry into a magical secret world—I treasured.

But it was also a world that had an extremely rigid set of codes and customs (perhaps all magical secret worlds do). As such, the school’s insistence that all girls wear their hair in “milkmaid braids” was very much in keeping with the school’s general philosophy. Although simple in concept, so-called milkmaid braids are not a simple hairstyle to create. First of all, it is a style that demands symmetry: a severe center parting from the top of the forehead to the nape of the neck (my hair has always resisted—and still does—parting down the middle). Then, the two braids—or plaits as we call them in Britain—had to be aligned so that the band they made across the head when pinned up would not be lopsided. Finally, the braids had to be pinned in place across a fidgety and impatient child’s head. Suffice to say that it required a great deal of maternal labor, as well as hairspray, to hold my plaits in place. And then—and this is where the true perverseness becomes apparent—then the braids had to stay neatly coiled on top of my head for the duration of a ballet class: a class in which there would be piroutteing and leaping. The more I think about it, the more perverse the regulation milkmaid braids seem, and the more inevitable their public fall.

Pride comes before a fall is the theme of a long narrative account of my days at the Royal Ballet School that I recently found in an old box of papers. The account is loftily titled “My Training,” and I wrote it when I was twelve for a school project about dance. I explain in the narrative how my ballet teacher “suggested I go for an audition at Sadlers Wells for the Royal Ballet school.” I continue:

“My mother agreed partly because it was near where I live. There were two auditions and most of the dancing was quite easy. A lot of it were [sic] teachers twisting you around to see how flexible you were. I was very excited when I got into the final audition for hundreds of girls and boys applied each year. When I’d finished that audition there was a wait of maybe a month or two to see if you were excepted [sic]—I was!”

Once, I got in, though, I did indeed feel excepted as well as accepted: that is, I felt like I didn’t fit in and I chafed at the school’s strictures:

There were two classes a week in the Junior associate course and I had a nice teacher. The only thing I didn’t like was the DIARY. The DIARY was a diary you had to write after each class saying which exercises you had done and what had happened. Mostly we did the same exercises each week so I usually put something like, “we did the exercises the same as last week except for the pliés. Then we did stretching exercises—if you want to know what sort look at last weeks page.” It would have been a very boring diary to read, we were also meant to keep dictionaries in which we wrote down the new french terms for exercises that we had learnt.

When the next year came around another audition came around and it turned out that exactly the same people as last year had got in except now there was one extra girl. [This was the Royal Ballet School’s version of the Hunger Games: you had to re-audition competing against hundreds of other children—every year, just for the privilege of being allowed into the classes—which, to be clear, my parents also had to pay for.] This year I had a teacher called Miss Young whom I didn’t like so much so my diary also changed, now it was more like, this, “I think Miss Young picks on me on purpose—she keeps blaming me for all the exercises that go wrong” or “Miss Young was actually nice to me today—she probably isn’t feeling well.” The teachers were meant to check the diaries once but that one time mine wasn’t among them, and the person who won the prize for the best diary was the only one who had kept her diary up to date.

The school’s regimented ethos was most visible in the precise and unforgiving nature of its uniform:

The uniform was a white leotard, pink socks, pink ballet shoes with pink elastic. You wore [a] belt according to how old you were. First year I had [a] white belt, second year [a] blue [one]. Your hair was worn in plaits across the top of your head with bows matching your belt on each side. On my first ever class my hair fell down in two long plaits—in front of everyone.

Oh the shame of it! I can still see it in my mind, although what I see is myself as if I’m outside of my own body and I can’t tell if it’s because I am remembering myself as I looked in the studio’s mirror or because I’m seeing myself from the point-of-view of a very stern impartial spectator. Probably both. This is what I see in my mind’s eye: I’m standing in a line of other girls in white leotards (white leotards!)—it is the end of the class and we are doing some simple sautés in the center of the room, and we are doing it line by line, which means that there are other girls on the side watching. As our line jumps together, I see my own face, rosy and shiny with sweat half smirking-half frowning as the two plaits tumble down and bounce on my shoulders as we finish the exercise and the girls watching from the sides titter. I know I wanted to cry but I don’t remember if I did.

The feeling that your hair is about to fall loose when you are dancing is a very particular feeling. I would liken it to another feeling with which I’m also familiar, one that I suspect is more familiar to women than to men: it’s the feeling when you are walking, carrying, say, a computer bag in your left hand and with a purse or shoulder bag slung over your right shoulder; you are carrying a very full cup of very hot coffee in your right hand and you suddenly realize that the shoulder bag is about to slip down your right arm causing you to drop the coffee but—and this is crucial—you realize this in time to perceive the exact chain of events that are about to occur but not in time to stop them from happening. It is a similar feeling when you are doing posé turns across the studio, and you can suddenly feel quite distinctly that the crucial pin, the one that is keeping your bun together, is about to come loose, and that, when it does, the whole thing will fall apart. It’s like a game of Jenga or, even more so, like that game Kerplunk (which I remember finding as a child much too stressful to be fun) where you have to remove plastic straws from a plastic dome without allowing any marbles to fall through the lattice made by the interlacing straws. By contrast, the feeling of a well-wrought bun is immensely comforting: instead of feeling either weighed down by the bun’s gravitational pull or pinched and pulled by hairpins, you feel, instead, buoyed, secure.

Twelve-year old me doesn’t say anything further about the hair incident in my written account. Instead, after recounting the humiliation of my hair’s Fall, I begin a new paragraph:

At the end of the second year I or rather my mother got a note saying I was growing wrong—(my body was getting too long for my legs—) and I probably wouldn’t get in at the next audition. I decided it would be better (or rather my pride did) if I just left at the end of the year without going in for the audition at all—so endeth my Royal Ballet career.”

Reading these lines now, I feel a lot of compassion for—and also anger on behalf of—the twelve-year old me trying to lightly play off an experience that was in fact very painful to me at the time. I didn’t quite get it right here; there was no “note” saying I was “growing wrong”; rather, as I see from the correspondence that I also found recently while going through old papers, at the bottom of the acceptance letter my parents received telling them I had been admitted for a second year of study, Jocelyn Mather added a rather ominous note asking if she might “have a word” with my mother “at the beginning of next term.”

mather note

I don’t know exactly what she said to my Mum during that conversation, but I suspect that what my Mum was trying to emphasize, in communicating to me that it had to do with the way my body was growing, was that the School’s concerns were not to do with the way I danced.

Nonetheless, I remember being devastated—feeling rejected and humiliated. At the same time, I also didn’t feel terribly surprised; and part of me even felt relieved. I had always felt slightly out of place in the program, and also guilty that I didn’t enjoy the classes more when they were so special and rarefied. My Mum was not like the other “ballet mums”—almost all of whom seemed completely immersed in the ballet world—and I was not like the other Junior Associates either—for one, I did not like to smile while I was dancing nor being told to smile, as I think is evident from the group pictures below. (Also evident: I am not pulling my stomach in and in the second picture I am not holding my arms in first position and I have a large band-aid on my right knee.) For another, I was also the only girl in my class who wasn’t white, a fact that tended only to be obvious when I was tan from a family holiday. “You look almost black!” I remember one of the girls whispering to me once, her eyes wide—was it in shock or awe? I smiled uncertainly, suddenly self-conscious at the stark contrast between my brown limbs and white leotard in the mirror.

royal ballet 81royal ballet 82

I am wearing the braids now. No bows. No Royal Ballet class through which my pinned plaits must hold their shape. No bow and arrow either; no battle royale through which my braids must hold steadfast. But I do feel that they are holding me steady, nonetheless: hugging my scalp, holding my head together—not too tightly, not too loosely, not perfectly wrought but well-wrought enough, which, perhaps, is just right.

braids June 2020

Standard

juvenilia

I’ve been going through a lot of old papers recently and today I came across a lot of artwork I produced in my teens. (Be forewarned, then, that what follows is simply a sampling of the artwork I encountered, and that, like most children’s artwork, it is unlikely to be of interest to anyone other than my Mum and me.)

For me, though, this was a really exciting discovery–it had been at least twenty years, maybe more, since I opened these sketchbooks and folders. In viewing the contents I found myself marveling–not at the work itself, but at how much time I devoted to making art, and in recalling the combination of freedom and discipline that constituted my art instruction.

The practice was to spend time, a long time, looking, really looking, and making marks on the page that were as authentic as possible to what you observed. That was it.

The objects we were encouraged to draw included: still life (the art room always had objects and plants in various shifting configurations for this purpose); the human body (we had life models who would pose for us at school, and we were also encouraged to draw ourselves); and landscape–in this case, the urban landscape of North London. I remember the many hours I spent, to my Mum’s slight concern, hanging around King’s Cross in the years when it was a pretty barren and seedy area in the midst of huge construction. My friends and I would take the bus from school and then park ourselves somewhere on the building site and spend hours making drawings of piles of rubble and half-demolished buildings.

We were also encouraged to spend time making sketches of art objects, whether images of artworks we found in books or objects in museums. Many times, we’d show up for art class and our wonderful teachers would encourage us to go and park ourselves at one of London’s museums all day and just draw for as long as we could. Those were well-spent hours.

at the British Museum

east pediment

 

Assyrian spirit

at the Victoria and Albert Museum

victoria and albert purse box

drawings from books

Seurat

Degas

schiele black ink

Dancers

I took ballet classes very regularly throughout my childhood and teens. Although the sketches below were made from photos, I also remember observing some classes and making very quick sketches from life. Drawing dancers while they are moving is really really hard.

greek dancersdancers

Life drawing

One day I want to write more extensively about the I think fairly unusual fact that in my mid teens (15, 16) I spent a lot of time making pictures of the naked human body, not least my own. We regularly had life models in our art classes at school. I drew myself naked all the time. I happily posed for my (female) friends in my art class. My friend from college, Sarah Jane, tells how, when she met me, she was startled by how much I seemed to like my own body–which I still do–even though it never did look in the least bit like the bodies of models I saw in magazines.

I think now that although at the time I happily embraced Sarah Jane’s notion that I just had a naturally “healthy” body-image, the truth is slightly stranger. For me, the combination of practicing ballet and painting made me regard my body almost as an abstract aesthetic object: a form that could be endlessly rearranged to make beautiful shapes.

I’m struck now by the fact that, in the third picture below, where I’m sitting cross-legged, my breasts look really uneven. Everyone’s bodies are, of course, asymmetrical; both my body and face are quite strikingly so and, while I’ve certainly felt self-conscious about this at times, I don’t think it ever occurred to me when I was making these drawings that what I was seeing was anything other than a pleasing combination of curve and line and light and shadow. Maybe that’s what comes from hours gazing at Grecian ruins in the British Museum.

The technique, by the way, in the brown-colored sketches before is one I only have ever used in secondary school. The head of the art department, Joe Kusner, had developed this technique: he would brush liquid potassium permanganate onto brown paper. We would then make sketches on the paper using charcoal and use lemon juice (which would bleach the potassium permanganate solution) to add light. I still really love the atmospheric effect it creates.

tendu self-portraitcross legged self-portrait

cross leg lemon

portraits and self-portraits

This is a watercolor I did of my Mum in Iona in 1994–so the summer I turned 20. I think it may have been the first time we went back to Iona after my Dad’s death.

Mum watercolor

I find both the self-portraits below quite strange, but I like them as a pair: one ethereal, one earthy, almost as if my face is made of clay. I think I was maybe 14 or 15 when I made both of these.

self portrait potass lemonself-portrait acrylics

things from home

I still have the waistcoat from which these details are taken. I actually wore it at my father’s funeral, when I was 18. I probably bought it at Camden Lock market.

Pakistani fabric

The two items below remind me so strongly of home. My parents were both devoted drinkers of Lapsang Souchong tea. Loose tea was kept in the Japanese-style caddy (made in Sweden)!

tea

chocolate bar design project

For one of my GCSEs–the two-year courses that, in England at the time, you took between the ages of 14 and 16–I chose a graphic design course. It was probably my favorite course, besides English, and this project–designing a chocolate bar–was my absolute favorite. It involved a lot of “research” consisting of buying and consuming the full spectrum of chocolate bars available at the shop around the corner from my house. Honestly, what I love most about the image below is the border, of which I was especially proud. I drew it in black and white and made photocopies and hand colored each page individually using felt-tip pens, which I remember finding incredibly soothing.

choc final idea

Standard